Re: feature request: differentiate between read and automatically marked read

[Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1572 bytes --]

>>> "ESF" == Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> On Saturday,  5 Feb 2022 at 09:51, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> That is to say you score according to their email address? I am
>> extremely interested in such a configuration, since I right now need it.
>> 
>> Would you mind sharing (off list if necessary)

> This is actually the one easy bit about scoring.  In the summary buffer,
> if there is an email from somebody that you want to have scored high,
> type

> C-u NNN I a r p REGEXP-FOR-EMAIL-ADDRESS RET

> where NNN is the adjustment to the score you want to assign to the
> person's email, "I" means "increase score", "a" means "address", "r"
> means regular expression for matching (you can use exact matching if you
> wish), "p" for permanent storing the score, and lastly the regular
> expression for matching emails from that person which will be pre-filled
> with the address of the current email in the summary buffer.

> For my PhD students, I use 1000 for the adjustment to the score.

> If you use L instead of I, you lower the score for those you don't want
> to see (or you deem as less important).

Thanks very much!!

Fortunately the email is offered when running this, oops cumbersome
command. I tried it out with our email of course. 🙃

Your messages are then in bold face (did you fiddle the setting of the
display variable you mentioned earlier?)

BTW I wish that scoring would it a bit easier to set up, what you sent
me I shall copy in one of my important registers (I use copy-to-register
a lot)

Uwe 

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5673 bytes --]