From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23961 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2021 19:21:46 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 30 Jun 2021 19:21:46 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lyfmL-00C6vw-0Q for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:21:45 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lyfmK-00652M-7A for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:21:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lyfmJ-00652G-5w for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:21:43 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lyfmG-00C6vZ-Ah for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:21:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9pt2e7xyLfXVogYBHizvpOY4zUTFVIGJsZCJd82QIMI=; b=CoeYEJJCCS3irBzadVOvAT9V5s O9CN5WXEBzqJWlYAnuV6KIv7lG8s//zC62cVUw2YvBFlIncwGLPn3X3Qv9bIyYzEGDb4vC+r8Tp/T 8dREv9WbACjZ/z4GIz6pdN/dTjJMbsESx17FL3SGif0v3jHsqKVu/cvT1yRlERGe2+/c=; Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18] helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyfm9-0004xk-Bu for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:21:35 +0200 Received: from localhost (c-71-197-184-122.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.197.184.122]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EE1AFA035; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:21:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1625080891; bh=9pt2e7xyLfXVogYBHizvpOY4zUTFVIGJsZCJd82QIMI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DKzFrWfARdnrUOA8DBd20WT1GQethtJo99V8KhZsQHELpnpp/+SizDyLHR/Bi269p Fe17Hx7iHluyenU7h+3FeMQJwUU3KCmi0FpB0WVY3Q4m++o8kyq68nhFDBj7SPmfR/ PA5capHyERtt9DPINAKJsX4JpNn0n/SUWQ80MLd8= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Cc: ding@gnus.org Subject: Re: search for mark over Groups topic not working References: <87h7j22iqx.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <87czt2pzcr.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <875yyu4u0p.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <874keed4fi.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wnrabpg0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871r9i32qb.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <87h7ida0s9.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h7hfgp5k.fsf@gnus.jao.io> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:21:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87h7hfgp5k.fsf@gnus.jao.io> (Jose A. Ortega Ruiz's message of "Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:53:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87r1gjtayu.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: Precedence: bulk "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > hi eric, > > a quick update on this... after cleaning up all my indexes, ditching > newsrc.eld and reconfiguring my groups, and also moving to xapian as > indexer for dovecot (not that any of this has necessarily had any > influence, mind you), i haven't been able to reproduce the problem, and > all my searches (including both dovecot/imap and notmuch engines) have > been working well lately. i suspect newsrc.eld (that file tends to > accrue and cherish stale state, in my experience), but i've got no solid > reason to offer :) Thanks for the update, and that's great to hear things are stable now. I certainly wish we had a better understanding of why things destabilize, but that might come later...