From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/88305 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alexandre Garreau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Converting TOFU into something less unreasonable Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:22:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87r2duiwku.fsf@portable.galex-713.eu> References: <871s602kh7.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87lg43xfwz.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <871s5u6con.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1546464066 32536 195.159.176.226 (2 Jan 2019 21:21:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 21:21:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus (5.13), GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of 2017-09-15, modified by Debian Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Adam =?utf-8?Q?Sj=C3=B8gren?= Original-X-From: ding-owner+M36515@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jan 02 22:21:01 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1genwh-0008Is-R3 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:20:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1genyH-00048B-Cv; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 15:22:37 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1genyB-00045S-Nj for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 15:22:31 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1geny9-0005hX-Dt for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 15:22:31 -0600 Original-Received: from portable.galex-713.eu ([89.234.186.82]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1geny7-0001W4-F4 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:22:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=portable.galex-713.eu) by portable.galex-713.eu with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1geny5-0005C1-Cl; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:22:25 +0100 PGP-FINGERPRINT: E109 9988 4197 D7CB B0BC 5C23 8DEB 24BA 867D 3F7F Accept-Language: fr, en, eo, it In-Reply-To: <871s5u6con.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> ("Adam \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Sj\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=C3\=B8gren\=22's\?\= message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2019 21:12:56 +0100") X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.2 2018-09-13) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4867 Ham tokens: 0.000-189--7161h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-183--6937h-0s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.000-38--1446h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-37--1409h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-30--1114h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus Spam tokens: 0.997-35088--680h-28346s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-37247--1174h-30448s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-external:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-37247--1174h-30448s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-28860--917h-23598s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org, 0.994-37181--1378h-30558s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: ham autolearn_force=no 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4867] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:88305 Archived-At: Why not just removing quotations when they are followed by=20 nothing? People doing top-posting usually don=E2=80=99t really dare removing=20 unrelevant excerpts from mails they=E2=80=99re answering to. I began to=20 think the good thing so far would be to stop having common bad=20 mail software put quotation of answered mails by default. So why=20 not just doing on our, receiver, side, what they should anyway do=20 on the emitter side: remove it?