From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/85361 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [PATCH] Two issues with the gnus-registry Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:00:25 +0800 Message-ID: <87r3vxq9yu.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87egtx70hy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wq7lsggo.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zjchxr1v.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h9yogjer.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87a942lg39.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8761eqlfvk.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mw82jdbf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bnoff9fq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8761ej8fvx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fvcdtgoa.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418914576 4064 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2014 14:56:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:56:16 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M33603@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Dec 18 15:56:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1cUp-0005WY-0b for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:56:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1cTy-0006oM-8U; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:55:14 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1cTv-0006oA-NP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:55:11 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1cTq-00063P-0G for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:55:08 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1cTn-0001wy-KX for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:55:03 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1cTf-000521-VH for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:54:57 +0100 Original-Received: from 114.248.19.111 ([114.248.19.111]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:54:55 +0100 Original-Received: from eric by 114.248.19.111 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:54:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.248.19.111 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LpoftkEGNKXf2PJOfnETk7kvyq8= X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.1623 Ham tokens: 0.000-2397--19149h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-396--3160h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-396--3160h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-379--3022h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-379--3022h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux Spam tokens: 0.991-28480--1501h-113223s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.991-28480--1501h-113223s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.991-27435--1450h-109083s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.989-28192--1791h-113228s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.989-28192--1791h-113228s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.1623] 2.0 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:85361 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:05:38 +0800 Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > > EA> Okay, here is Stab the First. > > Sorry for the delay (poke me next time, please!). Applied as a single > patch because there were many related parts. No worries, it seemed like the sort of thing that would be fairly dreary to review; there wasn't much rush. And a single patch is fine, of course. Hope nothing breaks!