From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84037 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: still want Seen articles split... Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:22:17 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87r48ia47q.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> References: <8738l2efij.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zjn7d6d4.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389194457 1809 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2014 15:20:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 15:20:57 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32289@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jan 08 16:21:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0uwC-0007o3-Ei for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:20:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1W0uw9-0006A2-9H; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 09:20:53 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1W0uw8-00069o-5H for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 09:20:52 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W0uw6-00086W-GH for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 09:20:52 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0uw4-0007dp-Oc for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:20:48 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0uw1-0007N9-Hb for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:20:45 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:20:45 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:20:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/MQzf6K7Pd8Z3/YMirY4i/dEZDw= X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84037 Archived-At: On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:55:19 +0000 Eric S Fraga wrote: ESF> Eric Abrahamsen writes: ESF> [...] >> I can't really take it out of there, because IIUC that will resplit all >> the messages in INBOX every single time I sync, which would be bad. ESF> This would only be bad if splitting leaves messages in INBOX. My ESF> solution to this problem was to ensure that all emails are moved to ESF> other folders when splitting, leaving INBOX empty each time. For those ESF> emails that you would normally have left in INBOX, create a "general" ESF> folder and move them there. ESF> Alternatively, do the splitting on the server instead of in gnus. ESF> Both approaches can work -- I've done both and, in fact, currently use a ESF> combination of the two. On the server, I split those emails I would ESF> seldom, if ever, want to look at on a mobile device. Gnus splits all ESF> others, seen or not. I keep everything from one account in a single INBOX to keep it manageable with other tools, but another account is always split into folders. Both approaches make sense in context. I can't think of a good general solution, sorry. A gnus-seen flag would help but not in every situation. Ted