From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79585 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Sander Boer" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: What is the consensus concerning Face:, X-Face:, X-Image-Url and gravatar ? Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:03:00 +0200 Organization: From the desk of Sander Boer Message-ID: <87r55ah81n.fsf@COLTRANE.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311858230 9581 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2011 13:03:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:03:50 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M27881@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jul 28 15:03:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmQFe-00022H-2m for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:03:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QmQFL-0004Xo-OD; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:03:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QmQFI-0004XS-RF for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:03:24 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QmQFI-0005Q2-2G for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:03:24 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QmQFG-0002dj-Mx for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:03:22 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmQFC-0001lo-BI for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:03:18 +0200 Original-Received: from ip209-99-176-143.adsl2.static.versatel.nl ([143.176.99.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:03:18 +0200 Original-Received: from sanderboer by ip209-99-176-143.adsl2.static.versatel.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:03:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip209-99-176-143.adsl2.static.versatel.nl X-BOFH: Aborted Authentication Lockout User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q8QXA52bIBk4sskY1AMr3baCE0k= X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79585 Archived-At: Hi all, I notice quite a few people in this group use X-Face headers, but I read that these are regarded to be antequated. I personally would like to use one of these methods of unnecessary embelishments that bulk up your email header, heck , it's still better than anything outlook produces... What I would like to know is what the good people in this group think of the methods for these unnecessary embelishments: devil's spawn, don't care or waiting for a better solution ? thx -- Sander Boer ...................................................................... An exotic journey in downtown Newark is in your future.