From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71762 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Any juicy outstanding Gnus bugs? Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:10:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87r5ghwpnr.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285445456 26218 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2010 20:10:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:10:56 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20135@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Sep 25 22:10:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozb5B-0004PX-Rx for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:10:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozb4z-0008QV-Ko; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:10:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozb4y-0008QG-0Z for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:10:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozb4w-0005Qy-KT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:10:39 -0500 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174] helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ozb4v-0000wN-00 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:10:37 +0200 Original-Received: by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id F02E75C113; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:10:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on prometheus.naquadah.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e39:e900:222:faff:fe9d:ce44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 033215C09C for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from jd by keller.adm.naquadah.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozb4O-0000A3-3H for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:10:04 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:58:06 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71762 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 25 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I'm thinking about trolling the gnus-bug list a bit and, well, fix > stuff. Is there anything in particular that I should handle first? Any > pet peeves? Do you check Emacs bug reports too? I have the feeling that they are often unread. =2D-=20 Julien Danjou // =E1=90=B0 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyeVxgACgkQpGK1HsL+5c2MfQCffhwnHF+SX2IDCa2CVmQFq8dt L0gAn3PVV/dJ7Vh4bfWYsruh0xBHH0q4 =dKcT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--