From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70816 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: slow imap start Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:11:14 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87r5gwa8bx.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87y6b4bnr0.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284462919 15587 80.91.229.12 (14 Sep 2010 11:15:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:15:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19189@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Sep 14 13:15:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvTTm-0005Ze-VA for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:15:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OvTTk-0002bm-S3; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:15:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OvTTj-0002bZ-Lm for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OvTTf-0001pH-KJ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OvTTe-0006i8-00 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:15:06 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvTTb-0005SZ-Rt for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:15:03 +0200 Original-Received: from c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([24.14.16.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:15:03 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:15:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W48q0PckHlHd6snJGXgaOnDX4hs= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70816 Archived-At: On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:00:18 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Richard is splitting mail based on a statistical spam backend. Those >> request the whole article to run something (in this case, Bogofilter) on >> it. So the splitting process is getting too many articles, spam-split >> is just amplifying the problem. LMI> How is the nnimap spam split stuff configured? Are you asking me (in which case, "agnostically, it just asks the backend for articles") or Richard for his specific setup? Ted