From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70394 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Faster, lolcat. Faster! Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:44:34 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87r5hbyp1p.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87aao05t55.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283517952 2994 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2010 12:45:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:45:52 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18769@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Sep 03 14:45:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrVeO-00056l-71 for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:45:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OrVdW-0006ZA-Mb; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OrVdT-0006Yt-T6 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:44:51 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OrVdP-0008Jm-Rn for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:44:51 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OrVdP-0003Ho-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:44:47 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrVdK-0004Ha-Lq for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:44:42 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:44:42 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:44:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gwrcb7yCn8sHY7+5KM8xyEgBAfM= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70394 Archived-At: On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:17:28 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Another performance issue I've noticed is that N foreign groups on the >> same server (subscribed through the server buffer and without an >> explicitly configured server entry) seem to always be slower than N >> groups on an explicitly configured (primary or secondary) server. LMI> Gnus should gather all groups from the different servers, whether LMI> they're foreign or not, first, and then do the right thing on them. LMI> That would make the foreign/secondary distinction almost disappear. Does "should" refer to how things work (as in, "AFAIK") or how they should work (as in, "so fix it, you lazy bastard")? >> In the "too slow to be done properly" category are the unread/unseen >> nnimap counts which as you know are usually inaccurate. We've had >> patches over the years but I don't think anyone has actually solved the >> problem. LMI> And I've never used imap. :-) You can get started easily. Just write your own IMAP server with a NNTP backend ;) Ted