From: spamtrap@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)
Subject: Re: Encrypting outgoing message but not Gcc?
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 02:54:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r7zh8k9h.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3fzfxiyl2.fsf@asfast.com>
On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 13:35:21 -0500, Lloyd wrote:
>> My archived copies are encrypted with the recipients as well as my
>> own public-key, so I can read them myself.
>> I don't think I've done anything special to make Gnus do that.
> Hmm ... as I mentioned in my other message a few minutes ago, I seem
> to need the _recipient's_ passphrase in order to decrypt my archived
> copies, even with the latest CVS of Gnus.
Ah, now I remember - sorry, I've been misinforming about the "done
anything special part"; actually I've put:
encrypt-to asjo@koldfront.dk
in my ~/.gnupg/options.
> Also, I think there's a gap somewhere in my understanding of all
> this. How can it be that something encrypted twice, once with the
> recipient's public key and once with yours, would only need your
> private key to be decrypted? Wouldn't there have to be two
> decryptions, one for each of the previous encryptions? Or in this
> case, is the encryption done with some sort of mathematical
> combination of both public keys, such that either corresponding
> private key can decrypt it?
I'm not able to adequately and comprehensibly explain the theory, but
I think it's a proporty of either assymetric key cryptography in
general or the way PGP/GnuPG is constructed (the latter being less
likely, probably, perhaps).
,----[ From man gpg ]
| --encrypt-to name
| Same as --recipient but this one is intended for use in the
| options file and may be used with your own user-id as an
| "encrypt-to-self". These keys are only used when there are
| other recipients given either by use of --recipient or by
| the asked user id. No trust checking is performed for these
| user ids and even disabled keys can be used.
`----
Best regards,
--
"Do not feed the oysters under the clouds" Adam Sjøgren
asjo@koldfront.dk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-07 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-06 16:17 Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-06 16:46 ` Adam Sjøgren
2003-12-06 18:35 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-07 1:54 ` Adam Sjøgren [this message]
2003-12-07 2:09 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-07 2:25 ` Adam Sjøgren
2003-12-07 2:37 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-07 11:07 ` Nathan Sullivan
2003-12-07 11:35 ` Adam Sjøgren
2003-12-07 13:08 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-06 17:24 ` Reiner Steib
2003-12-06 17:58 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-07 13:35 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-07 13:45 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-07 15:16 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-07 15:44 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-07 16:28 ` Lloyd Zusman
2003-12-06 17:47 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-12-07 16:50 ` Lloyd Zusman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r7zh8k9h.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk \
--to=spamtrap@koldfront.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).