From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53346 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gaute B Strokkenes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap versus tls Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:37:34 +0100 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87r852uo01.fsf@cam.ac.uk> References: <87ptmfhxj6.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <84of0ab15z.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <87k7axwef3.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <843chlyw19.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <87adbrq0dy.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <84he5z4pne.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <873chjtj8o.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <848yraamxb.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <873chiiyqu.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <87el12lle3.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <84el12bb3o.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1057606701 3728 80.91.224.249 (7 Jul 2003 19:38:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1890@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jul 07 21:38:18 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ZboY-0000xm-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 21:38:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19Zboi-0007ZT-00; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 14:38:28 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19Zboa-0007ZN-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 14:38:21 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 1620 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2003 19:38:20 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1615 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2003 19:38:20 -0000 Original-Received: from mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (62.253.162.46) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 7 Jul 2003 19:38:20 -0000 Original-Received: from belldandy ([81.100.93.186]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id <20030707193814.VNIG16215.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@belldandy> for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:38:14 +0100 Original-Received: from gs234 by belldandy with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19Zbnq-00043y-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:37:34 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAG1BMVEWWWBTly7aGMwb+/vz9 +ffIilb///+yaCxNCwHGVC3gAAACU0lEQVR4nF2TQWvjMBBGVUGwj3WxaY/aAWNfi0zuwZPuHp0Q ob079OwYjHrsChb0s3dGctJ0ddTzm9F8lsR7WiNiWWL/flviul9Uh0NR4vY/gJUxJjOEtt/AubBy UsotRfH2DbxWE0hom3w5XJUEKis9hACt2hR4B86VDOtqTNHfgeEGvLiUN7Ddze26Dx6y1CUa+ygo NwFQm0N/BeMzCZAtNIoQrd9EhcH5mWpnztB8ZpJBlH23jaAbuE4EhZ2Bam0TeJ0DRMCKVP6CegWk q4z2TVFUx0946FOPcSe9ELE3rSHAj15rBuddS0C4BGyAutfpVAQkKdZOQiwMMIHxlUDrgeej5Ns7 I/ccSWNBLda1XwYBEG1Qswy1yXJf879nA4cjkNI0H+FzoUyuRodPA5eqZwFONG34i30ccOxeKFUy flNe1szqsgLdvXwKCj6zjTXODHV9M46gZPCLlYKCGTYO8S0aOAvJzRfD0w+1XcGIsxLUw/sYl5sM 9n0yjkoSUDOByrijwRRiAq13NhqLJYB3ACazrgN2bIwanyJQKXhHAJPRPQruEaCJP2Shy4DJ2As+ FQjJZH7AZIy6w0pQiiRYAh8nTEZHYDfRqSDeB5OXq4EEcAC4NocvoBl4+n1cyl54nyLRNA3iIwRP wNGFOK1g1Gz8jNfaCjdtqJLm2LXuqMc+50cDIJQpr6X0OHa4X58ULAw03QbRd7GUiG/K04mj0bNB xQhwJkEsJiZ1Bbgb6CnF79cBE+jwF91qniOCP3fghUFKxOShjIATw/wOfIQTg39LpFHtxhlKywAA AABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: <84el12bb3o.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann's?= message of "Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:38:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53346 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53346 On 7 jul 2003, kai.grossjohann@gmx.net wrote: > Gaute B Strokkenes writes: > >> Well, I now have _two_ patches. The first one is the stripped down >> version of what you've already seen: > > Does it also work to set the timeout to 0 for the new > accept-process-output? If it works, that would be nice. Seems to work. I'm testing it now. -- Big Gaute http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~gs234/ Hey, wait a minute!! I want a divorce!!.. you're not Clint Eastwood!!