From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51831 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jon Ericson Newsgroups: gmane.discuss,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: How many people mark spam in gmane groups? Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 19:49:56 -0700 Sender: gmane-discuss-admin@hawk.netfonds.no Message-ID: <87r87qq8ff.fsf@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <4n4r5aowwm.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> <4n4r4y1jx8.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051325412 25783 80.91.224.249 (26 Apr 2003 02:50:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 02:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: gmane-discuss-admin@hawk.netfonds.no Sat Apr 26 04:50:05 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 199FlN-0006hY-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:50:05 +0200 Original-Received: from hawk.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.246]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 199FsM-0000uV-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:57:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=hawk.netfonds.no) by hawk.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 199FQ3-00087q-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:28:03 +0200 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by hawk.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 199FQ2-00087e-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:28:02 +0200 Original-Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 199FlL-0006hK-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:50:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 199FkJ-0006dm-00 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:48:59 +0200 Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support (Windows), cygwin32) X-Face: "Ro}i#1h*rV:tg+F.!]r/y,RDL'`*sc[_1LB'%*akh@LHbt,:gBJ/:2cS@:hpBLtYO)o3a; w3Tli`r,.jIZD-zR)p7:^V^}#Wz@.\av>O{!8S.h>lnL3eMT1",~EiISLm4rw/*qVW3xE#vj4}#Cq' 57,?HW3K-Hl.B+&{=>+e;R:J~'tJ*~fS*2n-G_8_5eS[w?#*JF~tj#~=zglo*\&YBS1&Zr2gP] Cancel-Lock: sha1:MeoUilAl9ew5gw/H4ZNul1xPYKo= Errors-To: gmane-discuss-admin@hawk.netfonds.no X-Mailman-Version: 1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Id: X-BeenThere: gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.discuss:3203 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51831 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51831 Ted Zlatanov writes: > It seemed to work OK for me; I looked at the network traffic and saw > the acknowledgment from gmane.org arriving for each reported > article, so I'm pretty sure it reports the spam properly. I just sent a message that reports that spam-report.el works, but I might have spoken too soon. I used gmane.test to mark three messages as spam. When I quit the summary buffer the messages from spam-report showed all three message numbers were reported to Gmane. But the Gmane approval page showed only the last article reported three times. I've cross-posted to gmane.discuss as this appears to be an interface issue. Jon -- Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God." -- John 3:20-21 (NIV)