From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23872 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: A (very short) independent opinion of Gnus MIME Date: 05 Jul 1999 20:15:21 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87r9mnotdy.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161526 4345 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:52:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA14146 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:16:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAB06261; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 13:15:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 05 Jul 1999 13:16:43 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA11612 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 13:16:33 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA14125 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.02 #1 (Debian)) id 111DGz-0005QA-00 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 20:15:21 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > The nice thing is the reply from the list maintainer: > > > The problem is that my current software isn't smart enough to tell > > modestly messy MIME like yours from really awful mime like HTML and base64. > > I much like this "modestly messy" to quality Gnus MIME works. Maybe > Lars could start use it as a kind of trademark in Gnus descriptions? > :-) Let me guess: the software in use was Listar? Today I got this mail from a friend of mine who happens to be a Listar groupie: Bok, Cuj, ne kuzim se do kraja u MIME and stuff... Uglavnom, ovo je bilo u changelogu od listara. El to u redu ako je i tako, ili to gnusi krivo rade? -- Rewrote another portion of the multipart handler to allow for the fact that Gnus allows you to have the first MIME attachment have no content-type and expects you to assume it's text/plain. Fooie! (The Croatian part says: "Hi! I am not really into MIME and stuff... Anyway, this was in listar's changelog. Is that OK, or is Gnus doing something wrong?") Someone hasn't read rfc2046!