From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84940 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hideki Saito Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Removing Self Address from the CC Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:52:02 -0700 Message-ID: <87siju827h.fsf@madoka.hidekisaito.com> References: <87d2ayyfxg.fsf@madoka.hidekisaito.com> <87iokqy08h.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410720799 20761 80.91.229.3 (14 Sep 2014 18:53:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M33184@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 14 20:53:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTEvC-0002d5-2X for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:53:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1XTEuG-0006Wa-Ui; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:52:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1XTEuF-0006WI-I2 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:52:15 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XTEuD-00049Z-WE for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:52:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTEuC-0007Re-A7 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:52:12 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id kq14so4849201pab.11 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:52:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GLtJxMtXmDzsvBYDEnei+NhfzLDhrfmr5tfk1FSy9f4=; b=T8PAGrTp++xlMhTkkefyhNPbmKyLy6ir3Wriq7DPKIvTuaRpTzvfqDQ4s76LyUsUvg O7QqYj4PtgwOExauOAR24ObMIa/jXyqH50BGr/r/gFbMpL9dwjg8tQGEwwywTG4Quyqm g02qeShQIkEaOrJQrrOeyORpuvWJr09O6ezyjMsN/V8e/IQJbdAxvnuOLUdExL1+W69m TfF5fhU3cQC/7jSfdK/QIk/IdU7SGddc1L6ccr7Ba5DvaixKHKwNEX0f0oN4NcjARsbX CqvihQQCBvyfKNRelE1rhS0I/bI9l0d8a3KC8D8/B43f9Cq0P+lh62gOQpVVe4BUMF8Y xMmQ== X-Received: by 10.70.16.2 with SMTP id b2mr37490652pdd.36.1410720725547; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mio (c-98-203-254-26.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [98.203.254.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm9369147pdp.44.2014.09.14.11.52.03 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:52:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Hashcash: 1:20:140914:ding@gnus.org::GKxYv2olgTVWYaGq:000048er X-Hashcash: 1:20:140914:asjo@koldfront.dk::ftwkmNF7ShSahT8h:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Dkip In-Reply-To: <87iokqy08h.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> ("Adam \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Sj\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=F8gren\=22's\?\= message of "Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:17:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.93 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84940 Archived-At: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=F8gren) writes: > > Does it help to set the variable message-dont-reply-to-names to match > your email-adresses? > > ,----[ C-h v message-dont-reply-to-names RET ] > | message-dont-reply-to-names is a variable defined in `message.el'. > | Its value is > | "\\(asjo\\|adam\\)@\\(koldfront.dk\\|asjo.org\\)" > | Original value was nil > |=20 > | Documentation: > | *Addresses to prune when doing wide replies. > | This can be a regexp or a list of regexps. Also, a value of nil means > | exclude your own user name only. > `---- > Thank you for the suggestion Yes, this is the way I have set up for the meantime. Only limitation I can think of is when replying to E-mail address to a.com (and CCed to b.com) from a.com, where CC to b.com would be removed...= =20 --=20 Hideki Saito OpenPGP Key: http://hidekisaito.com/aff2e40b.txt 1066 3928 7B0B E7CD A0CB 3686 1FDF D937 AFF2 E40B http://hidekisaito.com