From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84737 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Carlos Pita Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: move article painfully slow over imap Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:02:32 -0300 Message-ID: <87silhgmif.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406847821 23782 80.91.229.3 (31 Jul 2014 23:03:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:03:41 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32980@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Aug 01 01:03:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XCzNk-0006mu-JH for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 01:03:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1XCzMw-0002Uy-8h; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1XCzMu-0002Uk-Gf for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XCzMt-00043k-E0 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:02:39 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XCzMr-0004VU-IC for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 01:02:37 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XCzMq-0005oO-Qn for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 01:02:36 +0200 Original-Received: from 190.18.155.203 ([190.18.155.203]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 01:02:36 +0200 Original-Received: from carlosjosepita by 190.18.155.203 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 01:02:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 190.18.155.203 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:x7QAhpM7MaUHT5TKi/gB54MKtaU= X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0027 Ham tokens: 0.000-2403--17718h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-281--2067h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-281--2067h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-271--1995h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-271--1995h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux Spam tokens: 0.992-23099--1135h-99179s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.991-23937--1190h-102833s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.991-23937--1190h-102833s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.990-23693--1435h-102838s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.990-23693--1435h-102838s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (carlosjosepita[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0027] 1.7 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84737 Archived-At: Hi guys, I'm using gnus-summary-move-article to move messages to gmail trash over an imap connection. Moving a single message takes several seconds. Moving a list of messages has more or less O(n) with the same constant. So it's slow for one article and it's proportionally slow for n articles (no decreasing average cost here, batching the moves is not optimizing on some fixed initial cost or whatever). Is there something I could be doing wrong? Is there anything I could do better? Cheers -- Carlos