From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81270 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Fancy-Split / Regexp question Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:23:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87sjilpwbt.fsf@tsdh.uni-koblenz.de> References: <877h00vytj.fsf@tsdh.uni-koblenz.de> <87fwem4pr5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwemtmbm.fsf@gnus.org> <87aa4u1de8.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328689507 11526 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2012 08:25:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:25:07 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29551@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 08 09:25:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv2pt-00072O-0A for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:25:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv2oq-0001Ug-FF; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:24:00 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv2oo-0001UU-CD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:23:58 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv2on-0001MN-71 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:23:58 -0600 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv2ol-0007fA-DN for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:23:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7117D22D9 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:23:54 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eNqtrB3pZpnG for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:23:54 +0100 (CET) X-CHKRCPT: Envelopesender noch tassilo@member.fsf.org Original-Received: from tsdh.uni-koblenz.de (tsdh.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.67.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6341AD22D4 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:23:54 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87aa4u1de8.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:34:23 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81270 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > LI> I think that mostly just seems confusing. `any' means basically > LI> "all the address fields", and mixing the Subject header into that > LI> seems pretty arbitrary. > > Then `any' is badly named, if it's really `any-address'. The idea > with `any+' is to catch e-mails about "XYZ" in the subject even though > the majority of the cases have "XYZ" in the address fields. For me > it's useful and I have 3 such duplicate rules in my fancy rules. But > I can live with duplicate rules, if I'm the only one. Since `any' has been To and From for ages, I'd keep it that way. But of course, adding a `any-header' that matches `any' + subject + list-id could be convenient. Bye, Tassilo