From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: auth-sources asking for password 2 or 3 times
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:58:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sjveol16.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pqqjkkdm.fsf@broken.deisui.org>
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:25:57 +0900 Daiki Ueno <ueno@unixuser.org> wrote:
DU> Do you mean it is not feasible to change the format anymore? Though I'm
DU> not familiar with the history of the netrc format, I was thinking of the
DU> following extension introducing a new keyword "credential", which takes
DU> an ID associated with a password along with hidden attributes:
DU> $ cat ~/.authinfo # plain text
DU> machine example.org credential my-home-imap port imap
DU> $ gpg < ~/.secrets.org.gpg
DU> |--------------+----------+------------|
DU> | id | password | attributes |
DU> |--------------+----------+------------|
DU> | my-home-imap | PaSSwoRd | user=foo |
DU> |--------------+----------+------------|
DU> If an entry in ~/.authinfo has neither "login", "password", nor
DU> "credential", Gnus could consider the entry password-less and would not
DU> try to decrypt ~/.secrets.org.gpg.
DU> I think there will be no compatibility issue, except the netrc format
DU> extension. If a user want to try this new feature, he could just
DU> customize auth-sources so that it points to ~/.authinfo instead of
DU> ~/.authinfo.gpg.
Yes, this could certainly be workable. Could the line be:
machine example.org port imap credential my-home-imap credential-file "~/.secrets.org.gpg"
so that a) the netrc file can hold many such pointers, and b) we don't
have to change the file name spec to "fileA+fileB" as I proposed?
It's a little more verbose but IMO that's not a big deal in a small file
like netrc. It's also backwards compatible so the users don't have to
change their existing auth-sources or their authinfo/netrc files.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-23 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-20 18:19 Sivaram Neelakantan
2011-02-21 1:27 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-02-21 1:35 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-02-22 22:03 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-02-23 2:14 ` Daiki Ueno
2011-02-23 2:36 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-02-23 7:20 ` Daiki Ueno
2011-02-23 8:40 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-02-23 12:25 ` Daiki Ueno
2011-02-23 14:58 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2011-02-25 4:35 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-02-25 7:17 ` Daiki Ueno
2011-02-25 14:40 ` Michael Albinus
2011-02-26 0:49 ` Daiki Ueno
2011-02-26 8:59 ` Michael Albinus
2011-02-26 9:24 ` Daiki Ueno
2011-02-25 14:43 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-02-23 14:54 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-02-23 8:36 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sjveol16.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).