From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75342 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tibor Simko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gcc-mark-as-read sometimes broken on Exchange Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:12:46 +0100 Organization: CERN -- European Organization for Nuclear Research Message-ID: <87sjxs3rwh.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> References: <84aakq4oh8.fsf@davestoy.home> <84d3pehbbt.fsf@davestoy.home> <84sjy9909t.fsf@davestoy.home> <84oc8x8n52.fsf@davestoy.home> <84k4jl8mqd.fsf@davestoy.home> <84fwu98c8p.fsf@davestoy.home> <84bp4w82n6.fsf@davestoy.home> <84zksdbmmw.fsf@davestoy.home> <8462utbaka.fsf@davestoy.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292890404 25287 80.91.229.12 (21 Dec 2010 00:13:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:13:24 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23694@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 21 01:13:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUpqx-0006l5-UU for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:13:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PUpqp-0005V9-QL; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:13:11 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PUpqo-0005Ur-DI for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:13:10 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PUpqn-0004qw-FY for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:13:10 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PUpqm-0003kv-OP for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:13:08 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUpqk-0006ix-VE for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:13:06 +0100 Original-Received: from 123-45.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.78.45.123]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:13:06 +0100 Original-Received: from tibor.simko by 123-45.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:13:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123-45.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VjkdzkXm/NKqjmjW2X3U10f9sr8= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75342 Archived-At: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > But the question is why the exchange server says BYE. Considering the history of Exchange and IMAP standards, I think it is probably advantageous not to investigate too deeply but rather recommend gnus <-> dovecot <-> offlineimap <-> exchange setup. I guess there are more offlineimap <-> exchange users than gnus <-> exchange users in order to debug these potential server-specific issues... Best regards -- Tibor Simko