From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72209 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Are webmail.el & some files under contrib dir still useful or usable? Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:22:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87sk0ss6cm.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285788166 12254 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2010 19:22:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:22:46 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20582@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 29 21:22:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P12Em-0005DV-RR for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:22:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P12Eg-0004U6-NL; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:22:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P12Ee-0004Tn-QF for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:22:36 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P12Ee-0002pv-AB for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:22:36 -0500 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174] helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P12Ed-0006GS-00 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:22:35 +0200 Original-Received: by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id 6709F5C0F2; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:22:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on prometheus.naquadah.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_RHS_DOB autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e39:e900:222:faff:fe9d:ce44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09F315C0E9 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:22:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from jd by keller.adm.naquadah.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P12E6-0002iC-Bj for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:22:02 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:16:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72209 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I don't know if webmail.el is used at all any more. There's been no > major updates since 1999, apparently. > > Should I just remove webmail.el altogether? I think so. =2D-=20 Julien Danjou // =E1=90=B0 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyjkdoACgkQpGK1HsL+5c38SACgnBOkmgLRiBT0rHuTsySy1JQe 5cIAoM8dTodp0CL0LHWoUg4KVSoYVQ0i =pWIF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--