From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70420 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bug in nnimap? Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:20:33 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87sk1qfujy.fsf@dod.no> References: <87occh2whw.fsf@gmx.ch> <871v9diap1.fsf@mid.gehheimdienst.de> <87tym6x1p8.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> <87aanyhgvg.fsf@mid.gehheimdienst.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283545255 22709 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2010 20:20:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:20:55 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18795=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Sep 03 22:20:53 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orckm-0000hJ-Ig for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:20:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Orckl-0000gZ-VS for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:20:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Orckj-0000gQ-Kp for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:20:49 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Orcke-0004Qb-VA for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:20:49 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Orcke-00008L-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:20:44 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orckd-0000bk-FG for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:20:43 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no ([84.208.200.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:20:43 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:20:43 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8l5J4IblqU8Ytf2/+iDfSqBKTWU= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70420 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > Frank Schmitt writes: >> Like I said before: I'd strongly vote for disabling the agent for nnimap >> by default. > I've now done this. Wasn't it before? Ie. if you created a new nnimap server, wasn't it not initially not agentized? Seemed to be the last time I created one. FWIW I've used nnimap with agent since the agent's inception, and apart from the odd "wrong unread article number" sometime in the 2001-2004 time frame, I haven't had many issues with it. I've been running CVS Gnus since 1997 or thereabouts.