From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Pick and read method
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:49:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sknyhvts.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
Hi,
Would it be possible to disable scoring in the summary buffer
when one is following the 'pick and read' way ? Actually, this
method is more or less a 'manual scoring' of the messages/threads
of interest and thus, having both could confuse a user.
More generally, how many people are using this method and why ?
Talking for me, it is because I do not like automatic scoring
made by Gnus; hard to setup, hasardous results when tweaked too
much, could discard totally valid messages (or the opposite), ...
Maybe the adaptative scoring is not for me and I should stick
with the 'kill-file' + 'pick and read' method (currently I am
evaluating it).
Cheers,
Xavier
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 10:49 Xavier Maillard [this message]
2009-01-05 21:14 ` Reiner Steib
2009-01-05 22:31 ` Xavier Maillard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sknyhvts.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=xma@gnu.org \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).