From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66565 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: imap-parse-fetch: End of file during parsing Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:17:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87skydkfo9.fsf@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206523097 8269 80.91.229.12 (26 Mar 2008 09:18:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:18:17 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M15051@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Mar 26 10:18:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JeRmI-00020f-9b for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:18:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JeRlN-0008EX-Si; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:17:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JeRlM-0008EN-EU for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:17:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JeRlD-0006rx-Jy for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:17:40 -0500 Original-Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JeRlL-0004mK-00 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:17:39 +0100 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404DBC26D9 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:17:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:17:29 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: RyxOsK/P1FlV+ZzohMYvA/yzrM6LXAsNA7o8+NJWgSJ6 1206523048 Original-Received: from localhost (dslb-084-063-006-250.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.6.250]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4FD54A088 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:17:28 -0400 (EDT) Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66565 Archived-At: --=-=-= Hi all, today I've received a reply mail that I cannot view with Gnus. It says "imap-parse-fetch: End of file during parsing" in *Messages*, no error is signalled, and the message's text won't be displayed. I read my mail from my local dovecot imap server and use Emacs and Gnus from CVS (emacs and Gnus CVS, not the Gnus builtin Emacs), both up-to-date. The mail is attached below. Bye, Tassilo --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=broken-mail.txt Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-Path: X-OfflineIMAP-2089985718-466d4c6f63616c496d6170-494e424f582e756e69: 1206518= 429-0965584260071-v5.99.7 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by store16m.internal (Cyrus v2.3.11-fmsvn14336) with LMTPA; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:13:25 -0400 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3 X-Spam-score: 0.0 X-Spam-hits: BAYES_50 0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.001, BAYES_USED global X-Spam-source: IP=3D'141.26.64.15', Host=3D'deliver.uni-koblenz.de', Countr= y=3D'DE', FromHeader=3D'de', MailFrom=3D'de' X-Resolved-to: thorn+uni@fastmail.fm X-Delivered-to: thorn+uni@fastmail.fm X-Mail-from: obermaie@uni-koblenz.de Received: from mx2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.201]) by compute2.internal (LMTPProxy); Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:13:25 -0400 Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.15= ]) by mx2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B176C1EC8ED for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5C478980B3 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22572-06; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.uni-koblenz.de (mail.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.7]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4C37894B6A for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix, from userid 96) id 0B0A63803BCC; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.uni-koblenz.de ([unix socket]) by mail (Cyrus v2.2.12) with LMTPA; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:22 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.15= ]) by mail.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA8E3801775 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF40078980B3; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22759-04; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from yamato.uni-koblenz.de (yamato.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.69.154]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147A57894B6A for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yamato.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC6F263BC for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47E9F790.70705@uni-koblenz.de> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:13:20 +0100 From: Claudia Obermaier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: Frage zur Dissolution References: <87prtic2yh.fsf@uni-koblenz.de> In-Reply-To: <87prtic2yh.fsf@uni-koblenz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de Hallo, ich bin auch etwas verwirrt von dem Beispiel. Irgendwas ist da faul. Der Subgraph relativ zu {C,~A} sollte eigentlich ~A C v & C sein. Aber auch wenn der Subgraph so aussieht und nicht wie in deiner=20 L=F6sung, ist das ganz kein c-Block. Denn wie du richtig bemerkt hast,=20 macht der c-Pfad {~A,D} Probleme. Der schneidet den Subgraphen zwar,=20 aber ist kein Cpfad. Also ist der obige Subgraph noch nicht einmal ein=20 C-Block. Ich vermute, dass sich hier ein kleiner Fehler eingeschlichen hat. Wenn man das rechte C durch ein anderes Literal ersetzen w=FCrde, dann=20 klappt das Beispiel. Dann w=E4re C v ~A der Subgraph relativ zu {C,~A} und= =20 das w=E4re dann tats=E4chlich auch ein "strong c-block". Gru=DF Claudia Tassilo Horn schrieb: > Hi Claudia, > > ich hab mal eine Frage zum Dissolutions-Paper. Auf Seite 508 unten > geht's um "strong blocks". Demnach ist ein Subgraph ein c-block, wenn > alle c-paths, die mindestens einen Knoten von H beinhalten, "durch H > durchgehen" (pass through H). Das ist der Fall, wenn die Knoten des > c-path, welche in H liegen, wiederum einen c-path in H bilden. > > So weit, so gut. Jetzt soll ein starker c-Block ein solcher sein, durch > den alle c-paths des Graphen laufen. Als Beispiel wird der Subgraph > relativ zu {C, ~A} angegeben. > > Wenn ich alles korrekt verstanden habe, so ist dieser Graph folgender > (~ =3D nicht, & =3D and): > > ~A > & > C > > Wenn man jetzt aber den c-path {~A, D} betrachtet, so w=FCrde ich meinen, > dass das ein Gegenbeispiel ist. ~A ist in dem vermeintlichen Block > enthalten, ist aber nur ein partieller c-path darin, denn er ist im > c-path {~A, C} komplett enthalten. > > Wo liegt mein Denkfehler? > > Viele Gr=FC=DFe, > Tassilo >=20=20=20 --=-=-=--