Re: CRM114 Mailfilter and spam.el

[asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)]

On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 15:28:02 +0200, Kai wrote:

> asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
>> ; All my groups are unclassified, I should remove this one:

> It seems nnml:spam is classificied as spam?

No, I haven't set a 'spam-content' parameter on the group, and I
haven't set gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents nor spam-junk-mailgroups
either.

Hmm: It seems that spam-junk-mailgroups defaults to: ("spam"
"mail.junk" "poste.pourriel"), yet my nnml:spam group is unclassified
(which is what I want, but not what I expect from reading the docs on
classification:

     Gnus learns from the spam you get. You have to collect your spam
  in one or more spam groups, and set or customize the variable
  `spam-junk-mailgroups' as appropriate. You can also declare groups
  to contain spam by setting their group parameter `spam-contents' to
  `gnus-group-spam-classification-spam', or by customizing the
  corresponding variable `gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents'. The
  `spam-contents' group parameter and the
  `gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents' variable can also be used to declare
  groups as _ham_ groups if you set their classification to
  `gnus-group-spam-classification-ham'. If groups are not classified
  by means of `spam-junk-mailgroups', `spam-contents', or
  `gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents', they are considered _unclassified_. 
  All groups are unclassified by default.

   - from "Spam ELisp Package Global Variables".)

My nnml:spam group really is unclassified:

 (spam-group-spam-contents-p "nnml:spam") => nil

but:

 (spam-group-spam-contents-p "spam") => ("spam" "mail.junk" "poste.pourriel")

So maybe that explains why my nnml:spam group is unclassied even
though I haven't set spam-junk-mailgroups to nil?


  Best regards,

-- 
 "Mr. Cotton's... parrot. Same question."                     Adam Sjøgren
                                                         asjo@koldfront.dk