From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49820 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Splinter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Some spam messages are not sorted into the corresponding group Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:54:50 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87smv3daw5.fsf@splinter.inka.de> References: <873cn85p1u.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <87adhf2ib2.fsf@splinter.inka.de> <4nhebjlux3.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044392783 30978 80.91.224.249 (4 Feb 2003 21:06:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18gAGm-00082b-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:06:17 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18gAHn-0007W8-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 15:07:19 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 04 Feb 2003 15:08:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA15063 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:08:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 8228 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 21:07:02 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 8223 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 21:07:02 -0000 Original-Received: from quechua.inka.de (HELO mail.inka.de) (mail@193.197.184.2) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 21:07:02 -0000 Original-Received: from splinter.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with gbsmtp id 18gAHQ-00057i-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:06:56 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 4069 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Feb 2003 20:54:50 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <4nhebjlux3.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 04 Feb 2003 14:15:04 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49820 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49820 Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Sun, 02 Feb 2003, chris@splinter.inka.de wrote: >> Ted Zlatanov writes: >>> Are you using spam-use-bogofilter-headers or spam-use-bogofilter? >> I use spam-use-bogofilter. > Just to make sure: you do not pre-process mail with Bogofilter, right? No. >>> What does spam-check-bogofilter or spam-check-bogofilter-headers >>> return when you run it in the article buffer? >> >> "junk" -- `B t' though returns this: >> >> (: spam-split) >> "mail.misc" >> >> ("mail.misc" is not meant for spam.) >> >>> Can you show an example of a broken Bogofilter header? >> >> X-Bogosity: Spam, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=1.0000000000, >> version=0.10.1.3.cvs.20030130 > > I get the correct output on that. (spam-split) used in *Article* (on the full message, of course), returns "junk", which is the value of spam-split-group. In spite of that, the mail's not split properly. > Could something else in your split methods be matching? I wouldn't think so, there's only one entry which moves messages to mail.misc: (setq nnmail-split-fancy '(| (: spam-split) [...] "mail.misc")) If that's not enough, I can post the rest of the list too; it wouldn't be very enlightening, though. > Also, can you hit `t' on that article to show the whole body, > then `M-: (spam-split)' to see what spam-split thinks about the > message? See above.