From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46641 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Micha Wiedenmann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: conflict between `gnus-group-universal-argument' and `gnus-group-process-prefix' Date: 23 Sep 2002 13:41:37 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87sn017fyu.fsf@ID-56226.news.dfncis.de> Reply-To: Micha Wiedenmann NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032781109 31876 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2002 11:38:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17tRXn-0008Hw-00 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:38:28 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17tRWp-0006br-00; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:37:27 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:38:06 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA07935 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:37:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 14679 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2002 11:37:06 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 14674 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2002 11:37:06 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by gnus.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2002 11:37:06 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17tSCf-0005qx-00 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:20:41 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 14 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-186-022.arcor-ip.net Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1032783641 22501 145.254.186.22 (23 Sep 2002 12:20:41 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Sep 2002 12:20:41 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46641 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46641 Hi, just a question: What happens if anybody uses `gnus-group-universal-argument' and `gnus-group-process-prefix' resp. `gnus-summary-universal-argument' and `gnus-summary-work-articles'? I don't see anything to prevent this. Micha -- The problem with troubleshooting is that sometimes the trouble shoots back.