From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36966
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Matt Armstrong <matt@lickey.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: application/pgp
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:17:51 -0700
Sender: matt@lickey.com
Message-ID: <87snfvi4j4.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com>
References: <873d7yrrhr.fsf@cachemir.echo-net.net>
	<87g0byjb3c.church.of.emacs@cis.ohio-state.edu>
	<87u20b3jo6.fsf@cachemir.echo-net.net>
	<873d7vh728.church.of.emacs@cis.ohio-state.edu>
	<87n1635wek.fsf@alberti.gnupg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172462 11372 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:54:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <matt@lickey.com>
Return-Path: <matt@lickey.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 8006 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2001 07:36:20 -0000
Original-Received: from adsl-216-102-197-223.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO ns.lickey.com) (216.102.197.223)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2001 07:36:20 -0000
Original-Received: from squeaker.lickey.com (squeaker.lickey.com [192.168.100.10])
	by ns.lickey.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C7EEDCB
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: by squeaker.lickey.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3C17CBD24; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <87n1635wek.fsf@alberti.gnupg.de> (Werner Koch's message of "17
 Jul 2001 18:54:11 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 18
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36966
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36966

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes:

> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:08:31 -0400, Colin Walters said:
> 
>> Since hmh is the only person I know sending out "application/pgp",
>> maybe we could convince him to switch to whatever is more standard
>> :)
> 
> The standard is RFC2015 (which will be updated soon) and it has a
> lot advantages over the old application/pgp stuff.  Please take care
> not to send out application/pgp - accepting this content-type it is
> of course okay.
> 
>   Werner

Yes there is a FAQ re: mutt support of application/pgp.  The mutt
solution involves procmail munging the message into a form mutt
understands.  The application/pgp RFC is obsolete.