From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24339 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Removed forward slash? Date: 17 Jul 1999 18:48:42 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87so6ngr2t.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161923 8156 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:58:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA01286 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 12:49:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB28973; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 11:49:20 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 17 Jul 1999 11:50:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01098 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 11:50:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA01271 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 12:48:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.02 #1 (Debian)) id 115Xdj-0001jJ-00 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 18:48:43 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > I think I'd prefer to have gnus leave things alone that I purposely > type in to be seen. However, looking through the material at the > node suggested I discovered no clue as to which thing should be set > to "nil" to stop this from happening. Huh? Given that `gnus-article-emphasis' is an alist, setting it to nil will naturally remove the whole effect. > Further it seems that this `forward slash removal' thing should > default to nil to begin with. That's in the same ballpark with handling *bold* and _underline_, so if these stay on by default, "forward slash removal" probably should as well. Besides, when your Emacs correctly displays italic, it's usually easy to trace what happened. It might make sense to turn off the features when rendering articles on displays without any face support whatsoever (such as under GNU Emacs on a TTY.)