From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86967 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: gnus-summary-save-article: Xemacs better than GNU emacs? Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:20:07 +0000 Message-ID: <87twjw9fnc.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458839079 22419 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2016 17:04:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:04:39 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M35188@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Mar 24 18:04:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aj8gJ-00031H-3g for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:04:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aj8fK-0000ZP-Br; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:03:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aj8fI-0000Ys-5J for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:03:20 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aj8fF-0002Qo-OY for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:03:19 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aj5G6-0000pH-5o for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:25:06 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aj5G3-0000Sj-Sv for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:25:03 +0100 Original-Received: from 2.163.10.228 ([2.163.10.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:25:03 +0100 Original-Received: from oub by 2.163.10.228 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:25:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.163.10.228 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:591HD+cmVjq25wPAXWHmcnstgbw= X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4617 Ham tokens: 0.000-91--4216h-0s--0d--gnu, 0.000-82--3804h-0s--0d--GNU, 0.000-6--250h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-6--233h-0s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.000-5--220h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs Spam tokens: 0.997-351--5h-231s--0d--HX-Envelope-From:sk:junkmas, 0.997-351--5h-231s--0d--H*RT:sk:junkmas, 0.997-351--5h-231s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:sk:junkmas, 0.993-16789--676h-11341s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.993-17656--760h-11958s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4617] 1.5 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 No description available. List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86967 Archived-At: Hello I am using GNU emacs 25.1.50.1 and mua-gnus 0.16. Using GNU emacs I have set (setq gnus-default-article-saver 'gnus-summary-save-in-file) and saved a message, Now when I opened the file with GNU emacs it looked terrible a lot of chars such as (not printable) \342\200\213 .... now when I opened it with Xemacs (21.5.34 Mule) it looked ok I attach both screenshots, in the next message, since I am not sure whether otherwise the message gets trapped by the SPAM filter. I am not sure who is here the culprit, because I had difficulties to open UTF8 files in GNU emacs which contains such chars. Maybe GNU emacs is stricter with respect to UTF* than Xemacs? Uwe Brauer