From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/85104 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: blog post on gnus, dovecot, and lucene Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:23:02 +0800 Message-ID: <87tx3dtzx5.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87y4sszb70.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878uks9ooo.fsf@zoro.exoscale.ch> <87iojvzvtk.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87a956wstj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412843066 19274 80.91.229.3 (9 Oct 2014 08:24:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 08:24:26 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M33348@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Oct 09 10:24:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc91E-0006hp-Ru for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:24:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc90I-0001B1-W0; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc90G-0001Ac-NY for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:23:16 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc90E-00037B-TW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:23:16 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc90C-0001yu-VJ for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:23:12 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc90C-0006AT-Qf for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:23:12 +0200 Original-Received: from 125.77.224.30 ([125.77.224.30]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:23:12 +0200 Original-Received: from eric by 125.77.224.30 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:23:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 125.77.224.30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ahpXay7MQvpo/CaHW9B9aqrhKI0= X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:85104 Archived-At: Vincent Bernat writes: > ❦ 8 octobre 2014 22:15 +0800, Eric Abrahamsen  : > >>> I didn't notice that. I added that to my dovecot.conf: >>> >>> plugin { >>> fts = lucene >>> fts_lucene = whitespace_chars=@. >>> } >>> >>> And the search became faster. However, I usually don't use FTS (only >>> search on recipient or title). If I check right now, I notice that the >>> indexes are not up-to-date. So, you may be right. >> >> But it's pretty interesting that that did something -- I wasn't sure >> that calling dovecot as a process would even invoke the configuration >> files at all. But you don't think the indexes were updated, huh? >> >> It might be worth amending the blog post at some point. I've asked about >> this stuff on the dovecot mailing list, but no one seemed to know. > > I have done a doveadm fts rescan to get those indexes updated. So, maybe > the solution could be a cronjob? Right, that should work fine. At that point, though, I'm inclined just to have dovecot run as a daemon...