From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82056 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: arnaud.oqube@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Trouble setting up Gnus Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:36:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87txx32268.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d33s2oyj.fsf@gmail.com> <87vchj96se.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87y5mf258w.fsf@gmail.com> <87r4s794lo.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> Reply-To: arnaud.oqube@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342712237 12291 80.91.229.3 (19 Jul 2012 15:37:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: arnaud.oqube@gmail.com, ding@gnus.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: ding-owner+M30326@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jul 19 17:37:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Srsmy-0006oX-A7 for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:37:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1SrsmR-000587-Fw; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1SrsmQ-00057y-Bs for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SrsmO-00012r-JZ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrsmN-0006d3-3e for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:36:39 +0200 Original-Received: by wgbdq11 with SMTP id dq11so1723737wgb.5 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:36:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=vSrbitvo6/GcrBIw+qab6auewe7KGA76kWCQKZO7VmY=; b=v4UaU/ddQjdVrnACmYM2mutdie/BAfwSSgXxtCdlVxGY6WDZivUXtCz+HZ34kawBdB Nu59dt1xO2tDimEvX3yuOF+27vIHfCo0ciHwO2ukRvbaj5ZYB/5gwgyin+zbNOsxv6Is UD8InY7oJdRJyK4vTD3zbPPPaxY/zlnfYvr5B3LyvACt+JpjAqFfzptpS/aACOn3zw44 2qujOiVPCZ0H+jHkB/gqstsV7UuterXl7Lciyetaf9pAeTszDXyC+h90QgoaoW3lCB5j v2U4sHGL4lhdNWvdJ4VXbMmwJRFDO9VaibqADInuYm9AvdmaaqmKLbRq8+rDMYl41Vtu qTJg== Original-Received: by 10.180.98.138 with SMTP id ei10mr5912213wib.1.1342712193534; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from parnaud.polyspot.com (LNantes-156-76-100-31.w80-12.abo.wanadoo.fr. [80.12.85.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y5sm39026012wiw.9.2012.07.19.08.36.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:36:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r4s794lo.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:02:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82056 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: > > Do I get you right that you created Topics, but they aren't there after > restarting Gnus, and after restarting all message counts are gone, and > there's also this update issue? > Topics are there if I activate them with 't'. And yes, all messages counts are gone, replaced with a star. And yes again, typing 'g' in Group folder does not really update the groups, at least no new messages appear until I go into the group. > If so, at least the topics and read counts are stored in ~/.newsrc.eld > (`gnus-startup-file'). So maybe there's something wrong with this? > (Accidentally deleted, I don't know...) > I though about this, but this file is fine AFAICT. > > Maybe you also need (bbdb-insinuate-message) for that. > got it in my .emacs. > > No, I don't think it has ever acted this way without configuring it > explicitly. > Might be a flag, or a custom configuration I lost, then. Thanks. -- Arnaud