From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78369 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kan-Ru Chen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nnir.el: New `notmuch' backend. Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:12:41 +0800 Message-ID: <87tyebre6e.fsf@anar.kanru.info> References: <1301842105-18495-1-git-send-email-kanru@kanru.info> <1301842105-18495-2-git-send-email-kanru@kanru.info> <87tyeeb098.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hbad1pes.fsf@anar.kanru.info> <874o6c7on7.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302077614 16693 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2011 08:13:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26674=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Apr 06 10:13:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Nrk-0003GP-U8 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:13:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Nrh-0006Uw-Fq for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 03:13:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Nrg-0006Ur-M6 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 03:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7NrW-00062i-EW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 03:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7NrS-0000ar-Mw for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:13:10 +0200 Original-Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so1891334iwn.17 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:13:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=BymCXyAtAOjl+f7r9S0DAglhmptmYyd7K7XFVlSboxc=; b=RhwcpU38/TG87CoTmxItITt9kdLOLfLfrqqDu8TfRKoWhN+lYpzQuvfagRioRYQZ8a 0UqQUAFuheIT61A7PJQFlZlZnHlAogH3zR6Q1QBKwpXb26CA1Aj+RXvfVODNHvXnqGbs CsxKpWDy4Ax1Qx4zNHNp0kKMz0RxnjnqPO0U4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=FEiu5q8ouKIxlpoluejqIF/GrZC4PlvGm69fJoccM3YRExQtNKDZN8RegoaaRamV4X mOaEah2AbVzkJuTxovBWp8ZTU6eav4LqM+PStGZ41z0Ew8wdUP1JvBxs6dnK8/3BvH0i 7Xfq8dHmIiH1SM3D85oAz3RkvQdXo8AH/kEKE= Original-Received: by 10.43.70.71 with SMTP id yf7mr948897icb.452.1302077584304; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from anar.kanru.info (61-30-10-70.static.tfn.net.tw [61.30.10.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm260750ibo.42.2011.04.06.01.13.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from kanru by anar.kanru.info with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Nr5-0004rT-L0; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:12:47 +0800 In-Reply-To: <874o6c7on7.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:34:36 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78369 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:02:19 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > KC> Hey! I understand Julien's concern of notmuch but there is one thing > KC> notmuch does besides tagging mail, that is index the mail using xapian > KC> engine. Actually this is all what notmuch can do, plus some MUA friendly > KC> interface so MUAs like mutt or Gnus can use it as a index engine. > > KC> I'm still using nnml backend, so nnir is really import to me. I have > KC> experience with notmuch, it is easier to configure than namazu or > KC> swish++ so I think it is a good idea to put notmuch support into Gnus. > > I have no problem with notmuch support in Gnus, just wondered if Julien > had comments since he has dealt with the software. > > To me it seems useful and I can see how the Gnus registry marks could > synchronize with the notmuch tags. spam.el could use notmuch tags as > well. Alright, I'm too excited and cannot wait to sign the paper and contribute more code to Gnus ;-) Kanru