From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77364 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: testing Gnus and Emacs/XEmacs compatibility Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:59:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87tyfrepwl.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <8739ncav1n.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298671218 29420 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2011 22:00:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25688@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Feb 25 23:00:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt5hq-0005pn-Hu for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:00:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt5ho-00055g-Hz; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:00:08 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt5hm-00055D-EF for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:00:06 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt5hh-0006oE-Cb for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:00:06 -0600 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174] helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt5hf-0007mD-FB for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:59:59 +0100 Original-Received: by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id 1E0A95C200; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:59:59 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on prometheus.naquadah.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (keller.adm.naquadah.org [192.168.2.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21AD55C1E0; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:59:57 +0100 (CET) Mail-Followup-To: Ted Zlatanov , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <8739ncav1n.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:22:28 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77364 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 25 2011, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I don't know the answer and don't have a usable XEmacs or Emacs 23 setup > to test. But your question makes me wonder if we should have such a > thing. I've been planning for *years* to set up a build farm for the > latest Emacs trunk checkout; adding XEmacs and a few other instances > shouldn't be too hard. For Gnus specifically it would let us find out > very quickly if a checkin breaks compatibility, and we can think of a > way to do "testing" branches to test changes without putting them in the > master branch. I'd be glad. I'm not really familiar nor friendly with Emacs < 24 nor Emacs, so that would definitively help. =2D-=20 Julien Danjou =E2=9D=B1 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNaCZaAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXCssQP/Aw/yXDjhHjCQDfzfAHY2Nx3 is77gepwUikpfK8UOFulDFAMwXkWnIcC8WsPP4Ewpz1lMgSBqPam3la86i46RtTH 0CsXuO+Pmg59+3/OPfY9YiWqZlOoTDTQWRv8iD5H3fGzLhAxv/tOT/KOdL0sbCZy dVSb0TnbfVCP17WKKHg6W5cTNgpkRJn3WrQ72/IIwN8qKMt/xWeWPDdfui1S1GdE f9jdspzEsk+EIIvZxnspMoTyoZK+NU9k5HfKxFQWlV5XpKDHBRRIoylFa39PXa9/ hZdzuB0hY0ZNtr689uGz0htFqyjVU4Et6JV68dk7MfjgmEmWcMRlxizDN5o2Ml9r YaIkQqfyS6xo823ZKRdoV5yLokyAIevP9BehrmDWF9iIR1aS6VQ2dofFxpH/2e4I G+Th7OLNkODli8Zq5MHesXp96H6pe89WDBzkQoSPnyzXeJuJo3Z89TRAN7E4Ul+3 /ZG4xCDTmzz/jNjkY1wnVLkoGnU1r+UJV9QaISXb0ljUlo+oRecB3/jZzuI3ZZW0 rZP7IGgm+QKwRKkNCOAW8DbfYPF901n73rpnLcbq89HW26H8DG0KSK9sqshp7TAh RCzYXI97roPE3UAWCinyrgQXLFIolgRGXHyHZN6a/VOTfj0Vz7CJtKFuU61ARkMt UxQ9DMkxPuW8a3SBKJp4 =TLwI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--