From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77015 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: funny behaviour after last message Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:26:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87tyfzcm4i.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298251436 7031 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2011 01:23:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:23:56 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25348=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Feb 21 02:23:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PrKVD-0004YR-PG for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:23:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PrKVC-0005YQ-TF for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:23:50 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2Sw-0007wf-9v for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:08:18 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2Sv-0001Uw-08 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:08:18 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2Su-0004fL-92 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:08:16 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2Ss-0001Pw-UN for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:08:14 +0100 Original-Received: from 67.red-81-39-211.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([81.39.211.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:08:14 +0100 Original-Received: from jao by 67.red-81-39-211.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:08:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 49 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.red-81-39-211.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Attribution: jao X-URL: Cancel-Lock: sha1:+6M4WbpOHbsIZOHG8/ijkUB3iNc= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77015 Archived-At: hi, i'm using emacs-snapshot (a recent 24.0.50), which comes with a recent gnus 5.13. since a couple of weeks ago, i'm experiencing what i consider a misbehaviour. i use a three pane layout, like this: --------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | Summary | | | | | Group |-------------------------------| | | | | | | | | | | | Article | | | | | | | | | | --------------------------------------------- now, when i'm in the last message of the summary and press, say, 'n' (or any other command that would leave the current group), i get, as usual, a message in the minibuffer telling me to press again 'n' (or whatever) to enter the next group. it used to be the case that if i cancelled this prompt with C-g, the summary would recover focus (i.e., summary was retaining the focus). but these days, it's group which gets the focus after C-g. as a result, one ends up in the group Group buffer, and has to navigate manually to summary to continue to work there and properly exit the group. what's worse, if, at the minibuffer prompt, one press 'q', it used to be the case that the current group was closed (since Summary was the active buffer receiving the 'q' command, i guess), but now what happens is that Gnus is exited (or one gets a prompt to that effect, with the default configuration), since the 'q' command is received by the Group buffer instead of the Summary buffer. is anybody else experiencing this problem? thanks in advance, jao -- Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it. - Alan Perlis, Epigrams in Programing