From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76819 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Welsh Duggan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Incoming IMAP split problem Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:31:31 -0500 Message-ID: <87tyg4aql8.fsf@maru.md5i.com> References: <871v38c5jt.fsf@maru.md5i.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297873907 26874 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2011 16:31:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:31:47 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25158@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 16 17:31:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PpkI3-0000WC-0K for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:31:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PpkI0-00086o-Gd; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:31:40 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PpkHz-00086Y-30 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:31:39 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PpkHy-0001CL-5l for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:31:39 -0600 Original-Received: from md5i.com ([75.151.244.229] helo=maru.md5i.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PpkHx-0004ae-9m for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:31:37 +0100 Original-Received: from md5i by maru.md5i.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PpkHr-00044n-Hf for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:31:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871v38c5jt.fsf@maru.md5i.com> (Michael Welsh Duggan's message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:23:02 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76819 Archived-At: Michael Welsh Duggan writes: > Here's a portion of an IMAP split log that looks fishy: > > 11:18:36 882 SELECT "INBOX" > 11:18:36 883 UID FETCH 1:* FLAGS > 11:18:36 884 UID FETCH 25439:25440 (UID BODY.PEEK[HEADER] BODY.PEEK[1]) > 11:18:36 885 UID COPY 25440 "INBOX/sei" > 11:18:36 886 UID STORE 25439 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) > 11:18:36 887 EXPUNGE > > Why is it copying 25440 (correctly), and then deleting 25439 (which I > didn't see)? Am I losing mail? Here's another example. In this case I was able to verify that the two deleted messages were properly deleted (split to 'junk). 11:28:36 976 SELECT "INBOX" 11:28:36 977 UID FETCH 1:* FLAGS 11:28:36 978 UID FETCH 25441:25444 (UID BODY.PEEK[HEADER] BODY.PEEK[1]) 11:28:36 979 UID COPY 25441:25442 "INBOX/misc" 11:28:37 980 UID STORE 25443:25444 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 11:28:37 981 EXPUNGE -- Michael Welsh Duggan (md5i@md5i.com)