From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73725 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tibor Simko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Outstanding stuff? Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:58:31 +0200 Organization: CERN -- European Organization for Nuclear Research Message-ID: <87tyk3e9lk.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> References: <87y69rxxai.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> <87lj5r1ey1.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288468767 23410 80.91.229.12 (30 Oct 2010 19:59:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -50 To: Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22094@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Oct 30 21:59:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCHaB-0001i4-5Y for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:59:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PCHZx-00074T-Dz; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PCHZv-00074B-BZ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PCHZu-0005iS-Bm for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from cernmx31.cern.ch ([137.138.144.179]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PCHZt-00053U-00 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:59:01 +0200 Original-Received: from CERNFE21.cern.ch (137.138.144.150) by cernmxgwlb2.cern.ch (137.138.144.179) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:58:31 +0200 Original-Received: from pcuds33.cern.ch (83.76.137.52) by smtp.cern.ch (137.138.144.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:58:31 +0200 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [83.76.137.52] X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73725 Archived-At: On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> I'm seeing this only when I actually send the reply. When the reply >> goes into drafts `C-c C-d' then the unread count stays zero even >> after the second `g', as expected. > > This is really puzzling. I can't really imagine what sending an email > would have with how nnimap responds to `g'. Unless you're Gcc-ing to > an nnimap group? Yes, precisely, to (another) nnimap group. I was trying to provide a simple recipe, and such a Gcc makes the unread count problem occur consistently for me. But the unread count problem exists naturally even without sending out anything; it is sufficient to simply wait long enough for a new batch of incoming mail, while reading and marking articles and stuff; then pressing `g' with client-side splitting upon this new batch of mails will cause the unread counts to go mad again. Pressing `M-g' on affected groups will correct the counts. Best regards -- Tibor Simko