From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/68277 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: (file-error "writing to process" "bad address" #) when Gcc-ing a group Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:58:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87tz726xfm.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <873aenr2gk.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87tz73plyd.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87ab8v7651.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87y6wf43fr.fsf@randomsample.de> <87fxim8wi9.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87y6we71pg.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234285184 13941 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2009 16:59:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:59:44 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16717@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Feb 10 18:00:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWvyb-0004Ys-8H for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:00:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWvwb-0002qk-5m; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:58:45 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWvwZ-0002qT-T5 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:58:43 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LWvwV-00047z-Q7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:58:43 -0600 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1LWvwp-0002Dt-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:59:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCB3789A43E for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:58:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27132-08 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:58:37 +0100 (CET) X-CHKRCPT: Envelopesender vrfy tassilo@member.fsf.org Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (dhcp37.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.71.37]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC101789AB27 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:58:37 +0100 (CET) Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (David Engster's message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:38:10 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:68277 Archived-At: David Engster writes: >> Should I report an emacs bug report for this or do you want to do it? > > Either way is fine. Could you also run a quick test with Emacs 22? If > it doesn't happen there, one could try to find the commit which caused > the regression, which would be very helpful information for a bug > report. I'll do it later this evening. Thanks a lot for your help. Bye, Tassilo