From: jidanni@jidanni.org
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: nnrss vs. gnus-summary-line-format %L Lines
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:54:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tzjfktte.fsf@jidanni.org> (raw)
Gentlemen, gnus-summary-line-format's
%L Number of lines in the article (integer)
just shows up as "?" in nnrss.
As obviously the article has already been rigorously processes by
nnrss, one would think it only proper to remember to stick a Lines:
header in what is sent I suppose from nnrss to the rest of gnus, so we
can see a proper %L value. Thanks.
reply other threads:[~2008-03-10 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tzjfktte.fsf@jidanni.org \
--to=jidanni@jidanni.org \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).