From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66467 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: nnrss vs. gnus-summary-line-format %L Lines Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:54:21 +0800 Message-ID: <87tzjfktte.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205128500 13774 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2008 05:55:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:55:00 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14957@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Mar 10 06:55:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYayt-00070E-UW for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:55:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JYay6-0004Rh-Gm; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:54:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JYay4-0004RU-2c for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:54:36 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYaxy-0004s7-LO for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:54:36 -0500 Original-Received: from lax-green-bigip-5.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.5] helo=blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JYay5-0002rU-00 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:54:37 +0100 Original-Received: from jidanni1 (218-162-232-64.dynamic.hinet.net [218.162.232.64]) by blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDE65CFD5 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:54:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.1.9 2007-02-13) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4708 Ham tokens: 0.000-3175--11034h-6s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-2937--10207h-6s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.001-21--72h-0s--1d--integer, 0.003-6--21h-0s--0d--gnus, 0.026-1--2h-0s--0d--Lines Spam tokens: 0.965-6169--1518h-66868s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.965-6169--1518h-66868s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.951-5315--2083h-64353s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.947-5139--2258h-64351s--0d--H*r:3.35, 0.945-5165--2418h-65964s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: no 1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4708] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66467 Archived-At: Gentlemen, gnus-summary-line-format's %L Number of lines in the article (integer) just shows up as "?" in nnrss. As obviously the article has already been rigorously processes by nnrss, one would think it only proper to remember to stick a Lines: header in what is sent I suppose from nnrss to the rest of gnus, so we can see a proper %L value. Thanks.