From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65926 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Quoting the active region when doing `S W' ? Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:50:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87tzmr8ja4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87hcje31x0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87lk8m80vw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197244305 13039 80.91.229.12 (9 Dec 2007 23:51:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 23:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14420@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Dec 10 00:51:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J1Vw8-0006Fs-OD for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:51:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J1VvI-0000eE-5x; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:51:00 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J1VvF-0000dx-FH for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:50:57 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1J1Vv9-0003TW-82 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:50:57 -0600 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1J1Vv6-0000qK-00 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:50:48 +0100 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e27so762096nfd for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:50:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=Yo2DuSW3b4qseK+WG8ljlD7C6gy9Us/jIDL+q/Qw1jY=; b=tVv4+uYm3aZQeAUNa23iSpUTMTNI8CdDP80Vb41eWNSw6P/CebZ/LV8tbUkTXoBSGk9YcN1zd5cp4c1VBE6eN3uDwRxGIGJM/+W1zApGbq16K2k2YSgA2cWFZdAGQdWgX8rftiDar3IkLSwPGrAJPIWrqv8Oq2jBFzBJasdhL5c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=QPkMvzATctiQHwEIJU2OAIe+UejAZ74iFIS7G63xmFpTIT4JAZXBfs282rEMqwb9C4MTXC4Rxf6cEed7dXKN2AIwJ+cAqoBqjkyVlQZM1wmAs5d40jmM5FDsDIcVR2jGVu1Sl25VEu+6WI3t+o/59SZPJM+4sdyS8kgEfnx27Kk= Original-Received: by 10.86.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr4928910fgd.1197244249011; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:50:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [88.140.223.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p38sm3585568fke.2007.12.09.15.50.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:50:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F164D1593AC; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:50:43 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:46:36 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65926 Archived-At: Does this have been taken care of? Thanks, Leo writes: > On 2007-11-25 21:34 +0000, Bastien wrote: >> Bastien writes: >> >>> when wide-replying-with-original to an email, the active region is not >>> taken as the default quoted text but the entire email is quoted instead. >>> I would expect it to behave like `R' or `F' do. Did I miss something >>> obvious here? >> >> So I discovered the solution is to use `C-u R' instead of `S W'. >> >> Actually, there is both: >> >> `gnus-summary-reply-with-original' >> `gnus-article-reply-with-original' >> >> and both take care of the active region. >> >> But there is only >> >> `gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original' >> >> and *no*: >> >> `gnus-article-wide-reply-with-original' >> >> Maybe this is a bit confusing? Or is there any strong argument behind >> this restriction? >> >> Regards, > > What a coincidence! I have noted the same problem in: > > gmane.emacs.gnus.user:9031 > > HTH, -- Bastien