From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64694 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: message-header-xheader unused, maybe Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:37:02 +1000 Organization: Bah Humbug Message-ID: <87tzu0cqm9.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87r6perki0.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180143317 24320 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2007 01:35:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:35:17 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M13205@lists.math.uh.edu Sat May 26 03:35:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HrlBa-0007lu-KS for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 26 May 2007 03:35:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrlBN-0004HN-Iy; Fri, 25 May 2007 20:35:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrlBK-0004Gv-Jk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 25 May 2007 20:34:58 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HrlBJ-0004lh-HM for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 25 May 2007 20:34:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout2-7.pacific.net.au ([61.8.2.230] helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1HrlBH-0005TR-00 for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 03:34:55 +0200 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D09111395 for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 11:34:43 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp226D.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.34.109]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35358C09 for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 11:34:50 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HrlDL-0002mi-3Q for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 26 May 2007 11:37:03 +1000 In-Reply-To: (Greg Troxel's message of "Tue, 22 May 2007 08:55:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.0.99 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64694 Archived-At: Greg Troxel writes: > > Part of the issue may be the values reported by tty-color-alist in > xterm (NetBSD, XFree86). Does that merely reflect (or is supposed to reflect) the xterm widget settings (*VT100*color0 etc), rather than controlling it? > In my view the right colors would have high luminances and therefore not > be that saturated. I mean a light blue like c0c0ff rather than 0000ff. app-defaults/XTerm-color looks like it's got 5c/5c/ff for the light blue but 0,0,238 for dark blue. I wouldn't be surprised if some of that either emulates vt100 or ibm pc, or is an unsophisticated colour model (or both). Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > > I've lightened the default dark colors of some faces, Yep, that helps.