Re: oddies with enigmail

[Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>]

>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

    Simon> Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes:
    >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:29:03 +0000, Uwe Brauer said:
    >> 
    >>>  The   question is can I  clear   sign the  message  such that
    >>> enigmail would not complain?
    >> 
    >> Do you say  that pgg inserts the Hash  line?  This is obviously
    >> wrong - it is best to let gpg  create the cleas signed message.
    >> This will make sure that the correct header is used.

    Simon> PGG doesn't insert nor remove any  Hash: lines.  The output
    Simon>  from gpg  is used directly,  except  for QP encoding  when
    Simon> needed.   Gnus will QP encode  the output from gpg,  so the
    Simon> receiver  till  have to perform  QP decode  before it looks
    Simon> like  a valid OpenPGP packet.  This  might  break some MUAs
    Simon> that expect  the OpenPGP armor   to not be QP escaped,  but
    Simon> rather, only the signed data.   But such a message wouldn't
    Simon> conform to MIME specs (the '='  in the CRC24 tag is invalid
    Simon> QP unless escaped), and some MTAs bounce those messages...

    Simon> That the morale is to use PGP/MIME instead is hopefully obvious.

Well that is what I used
mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime