From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/60602 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: oddies with enigmail Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:46:56 +0000 Message-ID: <87u0iqk7sf.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87slyqs9z9.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87r7e3ok3p.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <87oe96pnkg.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87hderos59.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121788121 28393 80.91.229.2 (19 Jul 2005 15:48:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M9130@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jul 19 17:48:39 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DuuKX-0006Ji-So for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:48:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1DuuJf-0006EH-00; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:47:31 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1DuuJb-0006EC-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:47:27 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DuuJa-0008RN-MN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:47:26 -0500 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DuuJZ-0006nb-00 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:47:25 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 27 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: maportatil10.quim.ucm.es Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1121788045 26122 147.96.7.218 (19 Jul 2005 15:47:25 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:47:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:20:050719:gnus.ding::KyTjxV5jvby68PjU:000000001s3o User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Qiqodp8eNFutc7IPZz4LbxQPDAA= X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60602 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60602 >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson writes: Simon> Werner Koch writes: >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:29:03 +0000, Uwe Brauer said: >> >>> The question is can I clear sign the message such that >>> enigmail would not complain? >> >> Do you say that pgg inserts the Hash line? This is obviously >> wrong - it is best to let gpg create the cleas signed message. >> This will make sure that the correct header is used. Simon> PGG doesn't insert nor remove any Hash: lines. The output Simon> from gpg is used directly, except for QP encoding when Simon> needed. Gnus will QP encode the output from gpg, so the Simon> receiver till have to perform QP decode before it looks Simon> like a valid OpenPGP packet. This might break some MUAs Simon> that expect the OpenPGP armor to not be QP escaped, but Simon> rather, only the signed data. But such a message wouldn't Simon> conform to MIME specs (the '=' in the CRC24 tag is invalid Simon> QP unless escaped), and some MTAs bounce those messages... Simon> That the morale is to use PGP/MIME instead is hopefully obvious. Well that is what I used mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime