From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33286 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Splinter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Verifying articles signed in headers Date: 09 Nov 2000 19:49:23 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87u29h3rrg.fsf@splinter.inka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169423 24352 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:03:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE8ED049A for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:51:07 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAB16163; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 12:50:39 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 09 Nov 2000 12:50:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA10768 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 12:49:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95F7D049A for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:50:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from splinter.inka.de by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.4) id 13twly-0001pu-00; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 19:50:06 +0100 Original-Received: by splinter.inka.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8CAFCA815; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 19:49:23 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33286 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33286 Hi, Is it possible to verify messages signed in the head, _not_ in the body? This is the way control messages in de.* are signed and I'd like to be able to verify them.