From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24952 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-treat-strip-pgp defaults to t Date: 30 Aug 1999 10:20:34 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87u2ph4r3h.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162428 11520 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:07:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA22664 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:23:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAB17825; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 03:22:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 30 Aug 1999 03:22:03 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA11258 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 03:21:42 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA22638 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:20:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11LMg7-0003SH-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:20:35 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Still, it would be nice to be able to see whether a message is > signed or not, even if gnus-treat-strip-pgp equals t. Maybe a > message in the message line, or some symbol in the modeline? You're right. I seem to remember some discussion regarding the washing functions and the modeline, but I don't remember the outcome.