From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 8046 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2021 22:50:15 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Dec 2021 22:50:15 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Wuc-00CbMM-Eq for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:50:14 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Wub-002AxM-Ti for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:50:13 -0600 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Wub-002AxG-29 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:50:13 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0WuY-00CbLj-9y for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:50:12 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TRz0Vsycg5BBr8c8ycOXaQQqILnaRHDMxK1b+VbSjYA=; b=uHWWdNxrrg/ys2i5Joh+j3Qsrh px9qugiGtVYk0/zDDu6JWCn+BwVaqZlpVIsmxzbcib9xSrvlR0HGJD7oXURZ3KiJJShwzbU/Wb6j4 5iazKDDVkmoamlDyhKH/EOVCybWtaYWUWsBjjP4lkjC8DgSOy5CbmFxn/lqDWBlwD360=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0WuQ-0006Aj-Do for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 23:50:04 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0WuP-00010x-1F for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 23:50:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: Summary buffer, limit to the registry marks Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 23:48:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87v8zf9bty.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <8735mksjvl.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87y24c4gie.fsf@zoho.eu> <87wnjv1dl8.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87bl1718dl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87o85710h8.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87mtkrym6c.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:U7nDnsJStfwQ6MNDQ1TgnomHi6M= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Nope, you're right, limit to marks doesn't check registry > marks. Hang on and I'll open a bug report for this. Good job Uwe Brauer \o/ -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal