From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86468 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Moving Gnus development to Emacs? Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:04:49 +0000 Message-ID: <87vb7etuq6.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451581526 27200 80.91.229.3 (31 Dec 2015 17:05:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 31 18:05:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aEgf4-0006QO-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:05:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEgf4-0002qi-1I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:05:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEgex-0002ln-1S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEges-0007Me-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEger-0007MD-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aEgeq-0006BY-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:05:00 +0100 Original-Received: from 2.162.24.124 ([2.162.24.124]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:05:00 +0100 Original-Received: from oub by 2.162.24.124 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:05:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.162.24.124 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:v86FyQHKKujoFb55HzO0p+RekSE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197272 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86468 Archived-At: >>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > (Excuse the crossposting.) [...] > 1) is not true any more. And XEmacs isn't as vital as it used to be. I see, you left xemacs-beta out in your newsgroup field... > So: I want to know how all y'all would feel if I closed > git.gnus.org and started bringing the Gnus code base in the Emacs > trunk up to modern Emacs standards. That would mean removing > basically all compat code. Although I switched mostly to GNU emacs, that decision is a bit sad. Could you at least tag the last Xemacs compat version, before removing that code?