From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86093 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use IMAP MOVE extension if available Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 09:53:02 +0800 Message-ID: <87vbculcw1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87io9l2bd0.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <87y4ibf93c.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wpxuerau.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <878ua2cj3m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r3nta8e8.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87oaiqs067.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87vbcx460o.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <87si81b2l5.fsf@uwo.ca> <87io8wz3we.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87k2tbyc6a.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871tfjnetc.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438739683 27611 80.91.229.3 (5 Aug 2015 01:54:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 01:54:43 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M34327@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Aug 05 03:54:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMnuZ-0000Jk-1P for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 03:54:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMntR-0000nb-7q; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 20:53:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMntP-0000nM-Lq for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 20:53:19 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMntM-0008RT-S9 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 20:53:19 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMntK-000750-Vi for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 03:53:15 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMntK-0008Gy-15 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 03:53:14 +0200 Original-Received: from 221.220.62.166 ([221.220.62.166]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 03:53:14 +0200 Original-Received: from eric by 221.220.62.166 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 03:53:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 221.220.62.166 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:a0BCXtSXrGrhY2jXt8QLUOrn3vQ= X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-337--14839h-0s--0d--PATCH, 0.000-40--1757h-0s--0d--optimization, 0.000-29--1248h-0s--0d--parser, 0.000-24--1032h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-24--1025h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf Spam tokens: 0.994-8537--303h-6058s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-8537--303h-6058s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-external:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-8058--289h-5720s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.992-8468--372h-6058s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.992-8468--372h-6058s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 No description available. List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86093 Archived-At: Nikolaus Rath writes: > On Aug 04 2015, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> Nikolaus Rath writes: >> >>> On Aug 03 2015, Steinar Bang wrote: >>>>>>>>> Dan Christensen : >>>> >>>>> I believe that Gnus has to re-login now and then, e.g. when connections >>>>> are idle for too long. >>>> >>>> Ok, that may be a case for optimization: the CAPABILITIES may change >>>> before and after login, but it is not very likely that they will change >>>> for the rest of the session. >>>> >>>> Ie. issue CAPABILITIES only after the initial login. >>> >>> Preserving capabilities from one connection to the next would require >>> some major coding effort. In that case we're still better of trying very >>> hard to extract the capabilities from the LOGIN response. >> >> I'd say we ought to leave it the way it is now, until we've got a better >> parser for command responses. > > I hope with "the way it is now", you mean with either your or my patch > applied? > > Without them, capabilities are not detected at all in many cases. I > think fixing that should not wait until the response parser is fixed. Your patch is already applied! That's "the way it is now". :)