From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84111 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Totally incorrect splitting Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 05:06:58 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87vbwzi1tp.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> References: <87d2l0q191.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87eh3ph5xu.fsf@nwalsh.com> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391249107 11430 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2014 10:05:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:05:07 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32363=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Feb 01 11:05:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9XRp-0007SY-N8 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:05:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1W9XRp-0005t0-30 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:05:13 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1W9XRo-0005sv-9U for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:05:12 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W9XRd-0005Oq-W4 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:05:12 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9XRc-0006vA-2K for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:05:00 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9XRa-0007Ii-TC for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:04:58 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:04:58 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:04:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 33 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LSqx4IE36hTAqd+etxQyQ/K/ZPM= X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84111 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:58:53 -0600 Norman Walsh wrote: NW> Just FYI: NW> Ted Zlatanov writes: NW> (setq gnus-registry-max-entries 20000 NW> gnus-registry-split-strategy nil NW> gnus-registry-use-long-group-names t NW> guns-registry-track-extra '(sender subject)) NW> First, note my clever spelling of "gnus" in NW> "guns-registry-track-extra". That was fun to find. >> You can set `gnus-verbose' to 9 and endure the noise until you catch the >> problem. Sorry I don't have a better way. NW> Yes, thanks. I finally got around to tracking this down. I added a new NW> split rule that *never* worked and that made it a lot easier to debug. NW> In this case, it turned out that gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent NW> was splitting on subject and the subject was generic enough to have NW> already been dropped in my "misc" bucket. Consequently, my new rule NW> never fired. NW> I expect that explains my other incorrect splits as well. NW> I've removed "subject" from track-extra for the time being and I'll NW> see how that goes. On the one hand, it was sometimes handy to have NW> subject in the list, but I think the false splits probably outweigh NW> that convenience. I'm glad you found the problem. That misspelling is a tricky one. Ted