From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79519 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: lee Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "selecting deleted buffer" and buffers with sent messages staying Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:46:34 +0200 Organization: my virtual residence Message-ID: <87vcuym7lh.fsf@yun.yagibdah.de> References: <877h816fsa.fsf@yun.yagibdah.de> <87pqlm5dln.fsf@yun.yagibdah.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311101233 27787 80.91.229.12 (19 Jul 2011 18:47:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:47:13 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M27815@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jul 19 20:47:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjFK1-0008Ii-7y for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:47:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QjFJb-00006c-ML; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QjFJa-00006K-Cz for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:46:42 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QjFJV-00075U-0V for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:46:42 -0500 Original-Received: from static.103.179.46.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.46.179.103] helo=static.73.179.46.78.clients.your-server.de) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QjFJT-0000Aq-Dh for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:46:35 +0200 Original-Received: from lee by yun.yagibdah.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QjFJS-00029Q-SE for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:46:34 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:37:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-1693--6978h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-1524--6280h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-1406--5794h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-1406--5793h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-1347--5552h-0s--0d--H*u:linux Spam tokens: 0.995-1--0h-3s--3d--H*F:U*lee, 0.967-6044--1397h-54475s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.909-3373--4105h-54747s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.909-3373--4105h-54747s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.909-186--228h-3026s--0d--H*r:sk:static. Autolearn status: no -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79519 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > lee writes: > >> Ah, thanks! I've reduced it to three now. Are there any advantages of >> keeping so many buffers? > > I don't see any disadvantages. Since it's configurable, it doesn't matter, though it makes users unaware of the feature think that something is broken, and it can be confusing when switching back to a buffer to continue writing a message. One could also think that when a message supposedly already sent still shows up when switching buffers, that something went wrong with sending the message.