From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78553 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus automatic builds Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:58:53 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87vcy8d4he.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8762qs3swu.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r59fr05z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp0jpcl2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcyr5jzt.fsf@randomsample.de> <87k4f7mclt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcyp27g5.fsf@randomsample.de> <878vvfwhzx.fsf@randomsample.de> <87wrizuuad.fsf@randomsample.de> <87fwpid2rb.fsf@randomsample.de> <87k4eunrzj.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjtcoiz0.fsf@randomsample.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303333224 10729 80.91.229.12 (20 Apr 2011 21:00:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:00:24 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26856@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Apr 20 23:00:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCeVW-0004gX-8g for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:00:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QCeVO-0005fc-Vk; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:00:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QCeVO-0005fU-1N for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QCeVN-0003ca-Aj for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QCeVL-000762-VQ for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:00:07 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCeVL-0004ZR-NH for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:00:07 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:00:07 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:00:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LXbyxgHSscm4LEh6D65KlGQokOU= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78553 Archived-At: On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:50:27 +0200 David Engster wrote: DE> Please note that there's one little annoyance: You will get a single DE> mail for all failed builds, meaning for every Emacs version. That means DE> if you "really" break something, you'll get 5 mails. There's no way in DE> buildbot to send just one mail which contains all the information. I can live with that. DE> OK, I chose lisp/tests. DE> The buildbot will not run the NNTP test on new commits. I think the main DE> part of this test is actually not the nntp testing, but more that it is DE> an integration test which will fire up various parts of Gnus, so that DE> broken require's etc. will hopefully pop up during startup. That's great, thank you! >> Could this work if we symlink registry.el and gnus-registry.el into the >> tests directory? Git supports symlinks and it would be a neat hack. DE> I think this is a bit confusing, since the tests comprise only a small DE> part of those files. But I have no strong opinion on this. I meant if you chose to put "tests" at the top level, sorry. The way you have it now is great. Ted